Tax Blog

Taxpayer Advocate’s Insights on IRS 1099-K Reporting

By Kelly Hanley, Esq., Chicago Tax Attorney

As the agency responsible for executing Congress’s will, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) often finds itself at the crossroads of legislative changes and administrative challenges. One such recent development is the alteration of the Form 1099-K reporting threshold, a change that has stirred considerable discussion among taxpayers and professionals alike. This blog post looks at the intricacies of this development, exploring its implications, challenges, and the ongoing dialogue between Congress, the IRS, and stakeholders.

Background: The Shift in 1099-K Reporting Threshold

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 fundamentally altered the reporting landscape for third-party settlement organizations by dramatically lowering the Form 1099-K reporting threshold from $20,000 to $600, effective from 2022. This change was intended to increase transparency and compliance in small-scale transactions, particularly in the burgeoning gig economy. However, the IRS has twice delayed the implementation of this new threshold, citing administrative and practical challenges.

The gig economy industry expressed significant concerns, feeling caught off guard by the recent tax changes. Company officials are particularly worried about the implications of requesting Social Security numbers from their users, necessary for generating the required tax documents. They fear that the association with IRS oversight might deter many from using their platforms.

This unexpected move by lawmakers has left many in the gig economy perplexed. Although the push for increased reporting in this sector isn’t a novel concept, the origins of these specific provisions remain somewhat obscure. The gig economy, distinct from traditional employment models, often lacks independent income reporting. Many workers, especially in service sectors, are classified as contractors, hence not subject to automatic tax withholding. These individuals are expected to pay estimated taxes quarterly.

Additionally, there’s a significant segment of the population engaged in casual online sales through platforms like eBay, Etsy, or Facebook. These are often ordinary individuals seeking supplemental income. While the industry acknowledges the importance of tax compliance, it argues that the new reporting threshold of $600 is excessively low, potentially impacting a vast number of occasional platform users.

The new tax reporting threshold came as a surprise to many of these users, who may not fully grasp the scope of what’s being reported. The IRS Form 1099-K, used in these instances, reports the total gross income earned by an individual. However, this figure doesn’t directly equate to taxable income. Tax liability is calculated on profits, which are the earnings after deducting any relevant costs or expenses.

Here’s an example: if an individual sells a bicycle on eBay for $800, they would receive a Form 1099-K reflecting this amount. Yet, if the original purchase price of the bike was $1,000, they likely wouldn’t owe any taxes on this transaction. The concern is that this nuance may not be immediately apparent to many users, potentially leading to confusion and apprehension about the new reporting requirements.

The IRS’s Stance and Congressional Dialogue

In a panel discussion at the ABA conference on January 19, 2024, Josh Beck of the IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service said that the IRS’s decision to delay the lower threshold to a $5,000 benchmark in the tax year 2024 was met with widespread relief. This postponement reflects the complexities inherent in such a significant policy shift. At the same conference, National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins highlighted that the IRS’s move for delay was partly in anticipation of legislative action by Congress to potentially revise or address concerns regarding the threshold amount, although this has not happened yet.

Challenges in Implementation

The crux of the issue lies in the IRS’s current inability to differentiate between personal and business transactions. Under the new threshold, everyday activities, such as reimbursing a friend via payment apps like Venmo or PayPal, could mistakenly fall under the taxable umbrella, leading to the issuance of Form 1099-K for non-taxable personal transactions. This blurring of lines raises concerns about both taxpayer privacy and the unnecessary burden on individuals who engage in non-business transactions.

Collins also pointed out the administrative load this change would impose, noting the billions of Forms 1099 already filed annually. Adding numerous smaller transactions under the new $600 1099-K threshold could strain IRS resources and complicate tax administration. She suggested that modifying the reporting form to distinguish between business and personal transactions could be a solution, although such changes are time-consuming and complex, requiring at least 18 months for implementation.

Collaboration with Payment Platforms

In an innovative (and for some, controversial) approach to address these challenges, the IRS has been collaborating with digital payment platforms. This partnership aims to ensure that 1099-K forms are issued correctly, helping taxpayers understand and comply with their reporting obligations. The IRS believes that such collaboration is necessary to adapt tax administration to the realities of the digital economy.

Legislative Outlook and Future Considerations

As the IRS waits on potential legislative action, the future of the 1099-K reporting threshold remains uncertain. Collins’s query about whether Congress can enact relevant tax legislation in time for the next tax season is poignant, underscoring the often slow-moving nature of legislative processes.


The IRS’s efforts to balance compliance with practicality, while waiting for potential legislative guidance, highlights the dynamic nature of tax administration in responding to evolving economic landscapes. This situation underscores the importance of staying vigilant and adaptable in the world of tax law.

As all of us continue to monitor these developments, taxpayers and practitioners alike should remain proactive in understanding and adapting to these changes, ensuring compliance while advocating for clarity and fairness in tax administration.

If you have questions on how these new tax laws might affect you, call my office for a FREE attorney consultation. 312-345-5440.